Introduction
Several scholars all
over the world have over the year researched into the importance of
biodiversity to health, in this presentation, the work of some of this scholars
will be examined and as much as possible there will be an attempt to define
biodiversity, health and human wellbeing as well as, an examination of the
concept of who a tourist is and how biodiversity comes into play in tourism.
What is biodiversity?
Biodiversity
underpins life on Earth, and refers to the variety found in biota from genetic
makeup of plants and animals to cultural diversity.
Biodiversity, as defined by the Convention on Biological Diversity
(CBD), is ‘the variability among living organisms from all sources including,
inter alia, terrestrial, marine and other aquatic ecosystems and the ecological
complexes of which they are part; this includes diversity within species,
between species and of ecosystems’ (1992).
The CBD, which came into force in 1993, is a legally binding
commitment to conserve biodiversity and its adoption has had a huge impact on
public and political interest in the meaning and importance of biodiversity.
What does biodiversity mean for human health?
People
depend on biodiversity in their daily lives, in ways that are not always
apparent or appreciated. Human health ultimately depends upon ecosystem
products and services (such as availability of fresh water, food and fuel
sources) which are requisite for good human health and productive livelihoods.
Biodiversity loss can have significant direct human health impacts if ecosystem
services are no longer adequate to meet social needs. Indirectly, changes in
ecosystem services affect livelihoods, income, local migration and, on
occasion, may even cause political conflict.
Humans receive a wealth of benefits from
ecosystems. These are described as ‘ecosystem services’ and include physical
products, such as food and medicines, as well as useful services such as
pollination of crop plants and climate regulation. Many ecosystem services do
not have market prices and their economic value can be estimated only by
indirect methods.
Biodiversity plays a number of important roles in helping ensure
humans have a secure supply of food. For example, loss of genetic diversity
within staple crops represents a threat to human health when their potential
for resistance against disease, pests, drought and other natural or manmade
disasters is considered. Worldwide, the diversity
of agricultural crops – measured in terms of their genetic
differences – has diminished rapidly in the last two decades, dwindling to a
quarter of what it was in 1990 (European
Commission, 2011). Pollinators, including bees, are essential for
ensuring the
genetic diversity of plants, including agricultural crops. Relying
on a small number of pollinator species to carry out these services is risky
given recent declines and it is therefore crucial to protect a wide range,
including wild pollinator populations
(Potts, et al., 2006). In turn, many different species make
up the complex ecosystems that support pollinators and careful management of
natural and agricultural habitats is required to protect their biodiversity.
Biodiversity within and at the edges of agricultural land often ensures against
pest infestations that could threaten food supply (Diaz, et al., 2005).
For example, maize grown together with peanuts reduces the impact of stemborer,
an important agricultural pest in central and Southern Europe, and cacao
grown near to natural forests seems to suffer less from pest
infestations.
Microbial biodiversity also affects food security and consequently
human wellbeing. For example, soil microorganisms carry out important ecosystem
services by recycling organic waste and converting nitrogen from the atmosphere
into a form that plants can absorb. Their ecosystem services thus make soil
more productive for agriculture and it
is estimated that microbes are responsible for fixing over 140
million tonnes of nitrogen each year, the economic value of which has been
estimated to be around €63 billion (Brussaard, et al., 2007).
Additionally,
biophysical diversity of microorganisms, flora and fauna provides extensive
knowledge which carry important benefits for biological, health, and
pharmacological sciences. Significant medical and pharmacological discoveries
are made through greater understanding of the earth's biodiversity. Loss in
biodiversity may limit discovery of potential treatments for many diseases and
health problems.
Threats to biodiversity and health
There is
growing concern about the health consequences of biodiversity loss and change.
Biodiversity changes affect ecosystem functioning and significant disruptions
of ecosystems can result in life sustaining ecosystem goods and services.
Biodiversity loss also means that we are losing, before discovery, many of
nature's chemicals and genes, of the kind that have already provided humankind
with enormous health benefits. Specific pressures and linkages between health
and biodiversity include:
Nutritional impact of biodiversity
Biodiversity
plays a crucial role in human nutrition through its influence on world food
production, as it ensures the sustainable productivity of soils and provides
the genetic resources for all crops, livestock, and marine species harvested
for food. Access to a sufficiency of a nutritious variety of food is a
fundamental determinant of health.
Nutrition
and biodiversity are linked at many levels: the ecosystem, with food production
as an ecosystem service; the species in the ecosystem and the genetic diversity
within species. Nutritional composition between foods and among
varieties/cultivars/breeds of the same food can differ dramatically, affecting
micronutrient availability in the diet. Healthy local diets, with adequate
average levels of nutrients intake, necessitates maintenance of high
biodiversity levels.
Intensified
and enhanced food production through irrigation, use of fertilizer, plant
protection (pesticides) or the introduction of crop varieties and cropping
patterns affect biodiversity, and thus impact global nutritional status and
human health. Habitat simplification, species loss and species succession often
enhance communities vulnerabilities as a function of environmental receptivity
to ill health.
Importance of biodiversity for health research and traditional
medicine
Traditional
medicine continue to play an essential role in health care, especially in
primary health care. Traditional medicines are estimated to be used by 60% of
the world’s population and in some countries are extensively incorporated into
the public health system. Medicinal plant use is the most common medication
tool in traditional medicine and complementary medicine worldwide. Medicinal
plants are supplied through collection from wild populations and cultivation.
Many communities rely on natural products collected from ecosystems for
medicinal and cultural purposes, in addition to food.
Although
synthetic medicines are available for many purposes, the global need and demand
for natural products persists for use as medicinal products and biomedical
research that relies on plants, animals and microbes to understand human
physiology and to understand and treat human diseases.
Infectious diseases
Human
activities are disturbing both the structure and functions of ecosystems and
altering native biodiversity. Such disturbances reduce the abundance of some
organisms, cause population growth in others, modify the interactions among
organisms, and alter the interactions between organisms and their physical and
chemical environments. Patterns of infectious diseases are sensitive to these
disturbances. Major processes affecting infectious disease reservoirs and
transmission include, deforestation; land-use change; water management e.g.
through dam construction, irrigation, uncontrolled urbanization or urban
sprawl; resistance to pesticide chemicals used to control certain disease
vectors; climate variability and change; migration and international travel and
trade; and the accidental or intentional human introduction of pathogens.
Climate change, biodiversity and health
Biodiversity
provides numerous ecosystem services that are crucial to human well-being at
present and in the future. Climate is an integral part of ecosystem functioning
and human health is impacted directly and indirectly by results of climatic
conditions upon terrestrial and marine ecosystems. Marine biodiversity is
affected by ocean acidification related to levels of carbon in the atmosphere.
Terrestrial biodiversity is influenced by climate variability, such as extreme
weather events (ie drought, flooding) that directly influence ecosystem health
and the productivity and availability of ecosystem goods and services for human
use. Longer term changes in climate affect the viability and health of
ecosystems, influencing shifts in the distribution of plants, pathogens,
animals, and even human settlements.
Key Facts: Biodiversity and Health
• More than half of all new drugs are based on or connected to
natural products (Ganesan, 2008)
• Around two thirds of the agents that cause human disease are
naturally transmitted from animals to humans (Diaz et al, 2005).
• More than half of the world’s population live in urban
environments (Dean et al, 2011). Most do not have easy access to green
spaces (Hladnik and
Pirnat, 2011).
• A quarter of all European species are under threat. 25% of
marine mammals, 15% of terrestrial mammals, 22% of amphibians, 21% of reptiles
and 12% of birds are facing extinction at the European level (EEA, 2010). loss
by the year 2020.
In addition, the ‘essential contribution to human wellbeing’ of
biodiversity
is recognised under the EU’s longer term vision for protecting and
restoring biodiversity by 2050. This Future Brief explores emerging issues and
recent developments in our understanding of the link between biodiversity and
human health.
The natural world is a vast resource of chemical and genetic
diversity which makes major contributions to medicine. Chemical compounds
produced by plants,
animals or microbes have been used as medicines for decades –
centuries in some cases. Some of the best known examples are the penicillin
antibiotics, originally
discovered as natural products made by fungi, and the painkiller
aspirin, developed by making chemical modifications to a substance in willow
bark called salicin. More recent advances mean that scientists are also able to
make medically important compounds by making genetic changes to the organisms
that produce them, or by reengineering
other organisms to produce the compounds. The anti-malarial
artemisinin, an extract of sweet wormwood, can now be produced in large
quantities in genetically modified yeast (Ro, et al. 2006) and
scientists are using genetic approaches to address drug resistance
problems by tweaking the biochemistry of bacteria. Certain
environmental niches, such as the deep ocean, may represent huge genetic
resources with largely untapped potential for biomedical applications. For
example, structurally unusual chemicals with anticancer activities have
recently been isolated from bacteria that grow on coral reefs (Taori, et al.
2008).
The chemical structures produced in nature are relatively few when
compared to all possible structures – an infinite number – but they have been
honed through many millions of years of evolution. If lost, these biologically
active structures may not be so easily accessible through computational or
synthetic means. Furthermore, drug development is a slow process (between
1970-2006, only 24 natural product discoveries led directly to the approval of
new drugs (Ganesan, 2008)), which highlights the urgency of protecting
biodiversity now. Nature is not just a source of new drug
discoveries; it also provides inspiration for the design of novel
drugs produced in the laboratory. More than half of new drugs marketed between
1981-2006 had some
natural product connection, providing one compelling argument for
preserving
biodiversity. One example is the antibiotic SQ26,180, which was
discovered in a
bacterium and replaced by a synthetic mimic.
How to Protect
Biodiversity and Health
Improving scientific, political and public understanding of the
connections between biodiversity and health will be key to ensuring that the
consequences of biodiversity disturbances, and any resulting impacts on human
health, are minimized. The value of biodiversity is increasingly recognized by
international conventions and, within Europe, under policy frameworks for its
conservation. However, careful management of ecosystems is required to protect
human health in the future.
The following recommendations highlight just some of the key areas
of concern and general principles for policy action:
• Health arguments should be incorporated into policy frameworks
for action to conserve
biodiversity.
• Managing specific ecosystem services does not always benefit
biodiversity more broadly and may, in the long-term, have negative consequences
for other ecosystem services and for human health. This should be reflected in
assessments, including
when possible cost-benefit analyses, of decisions and policies
affecting ecosystems.
• For some ecosystem services relevant to health, benefits are
best expressed in monetary terms in order to aid decision making processes.
However, it may not be realistic to calculate an economic value for others.
• Singular policy measures designed to preserve ecosystem benefits
to human health will be limited in their scope – a suite of different policy
instruments may be required to tackle biodiversity disturbances at their root
causes. Coordination between different mechanisms and at regional, national and
international levels is key.
• Climate change requires special attention because it poses a
threat to biodiversity across all types of ecosystems with unpredictable
consequences for health.
• The links between biodiversity and human diseases are complex
and require further investigation. However, an awareness of the potential risks
associated with development activities, such as deforestation and
afforestation, dam building and farming, is crucial and should form the basis
for development decisions.
• Incorporating green spaces into urban planning combines
opportunities for conserving biodiversity with health benefits to the
population. Further research would help characterize the nature of the links
that tie human wellbeing to biodiversity within the urban environment.
• Changes to biodiversity affect the availability of food and
medicines and the incidence of many different pests and diseases.
• Human physical, psychological and emotional wellbeing are
closely connected to biodiversity.
• Many links between biodiversity and human health are complex and
difficult to characterize.
• Disturbances to biodiversity will have consequences for human
health. These will often be unpredictable and undesirable.
• Diverse and well-coordinated policies are required to protect
human health from the negative consequences of biodiversity disturbances.
The concept of tourism
Tourism
has been defined variously by various scholars over the years to include the
business of travel for leisure, recreation and or research; however for the
purpose of this paper the definition put forward by Aremu 2001 will be used.
According to him; “tourism can be defined as the science, art, and business of
attracting and transporting visitors, accommodating them and catering for their
needs and wants. The entire world industry of travel, hotels, transportation,
and all other components including promotion, serves the needs and wants of
travelers. Tourism today has been given new meaning, and it is primarily a term
in economics referring to an industry” (McIntosh et al, 1977, Aremu D.A 2001).
The above definition of a tourism connotates that tourism involves
people traveling from one place to the other. The reason for travelling could
be to know more about the cultures of other lands or simply to relax and
improve on ones health, from the above discussion on biodiversity and health it
clear that biodiversity can serve as a source of tourism resource especially
for medical and ecotourism. If the biodiversity is properly understood and
preserved, it could help in promoting tourism; tourist would travel from urban
centers of less biodiversity wealth to areas of high biodiversity complexity.
Tourist travel to enjoy scenic beauties of activities such as bird watching,
landscaping and watching animal migration scenes and so many other reasons.
Biodiversity and mental
wellbeing
There is an argument that biodiversity has serious implication for
mental wellbeing by such authors like Erik Erikson, Harold Searie and the
likes. Studies overtime has proved their arguments to be true at least in some
parts of the world.
There are three fundamental theories used to argue that
biodiversity positively affects human mental wellbeing, these theories are:
1.
Biophilia: this represents
an evolution-based theory defined as the innate emotional affinity of human
beings to other living organisms and nature. It is hypothesized that this
behavior is determined by a programmed genetic sequence along the course of
human evolution which a positive response to natural environments in accordance
with its own survival. Based on this perspective the concept of affinity towards
diversity was developed, this explains the individual’s ability and
predisposition to appreciate variant dynamic interaction of human and nature in
everyday situation.
2.
Attention to restoration:
the theory is based on works of US psychologist W. James, he postulates that
“in all individuals there are two areas of mental attention, a) direct
attention, which is voluntary and intentional, i.e. one concentrates on aspects
regarded as important for oneself. Other less important issues are classified
as distraction and have to be blocked by the mind, which in turn produces
mental fatigue (direct attention fatigue, or DAF); b) indirect attention
(called fascination) which involuntary and automatic, keeping concentration
with little or no efforts at all. This allows the brain to recover (or
restore), and then going back to direct attention. Attention restoration
process takes place in the right side of the frontal cortex of the brain, which
form an evolutionary stand point, being alert and focused was necessary for
survival”
3.
Psycho-physiologic stress recovery:
the theory is based on the empiric result observed in the positive responses
given by individuals exposed to natural environments. “under stressful
conditions, an individual react following a physiologic mechanism pattern known
as ‘fight or flight response’. This reaction involves catecholamine secretion
(including epinephrine) into the bloodstream, which causes muscular tension,
rise blood pressure, accelerates pulse rate, constrict blood vessels and increase
perspiration……. Some studies have found that contact with nature causes people
to lower their stress level, even at a short time after the exposure has begun.
The above
arguments no have great implications for the flow of tourists to different
parts of the world in search of that unique opportunity to relax and savour the
therapeutic and stress relieving power of nature. People seek to experience a
new environment different from their everyday life and work experience and seek
a means to release the stress and tension of work accrued over time. This
singular reason has accounted for the mass movement of tourists across the
world in recent times and has spurred tourism to its recent position as the
world’s highest foreign income earning economic sector capable of improving the
economies of even the most underdeveloped nations of the world.
Conclusion
Biodiversity
holds great potential for health, not only in providing the source from which
medicines and drugs used in cure and prevention of many diseases can be
obtained, but in also providing human populations all over the world with its
cycling capacity of environmental purification. Biodiversity must be maintained
as several studies have shown that sustainable biodiversity practices improves
human health, help in disease control and serves a major role in maintaining
equilibriums that aid survival and continued existence of life on this our
planet earth. As the World Health Organization puts it “man needs the
biological diversity to survive, while the biodiversity does not need man at
all to continue to exist”. The onus of environmental protection and sustainable
use therefore at this present age and time more than ever before rest on mans
ability to sustain, protect, conserve and respect biodiversity, for only
sustainable interaction can yield and lead to sustainable development.
References
Aremu D.A. (2001):
“Organizing Tourism Committees and Survey of Tourist Resource in Local
Government Areas in Nigeria” in Cultural
and Ecotourism Development Management in Nigeria. Edited by D.A. Aremu.
Hope Publications, Ibadan.
Brussaard, L., et
al. (2007): Soil biodiversity for agricultural sustainability. Agriculture,
Ecosystems & Environment. 121(3): 233-244.
Chivian, E. et al. (2002): Biodiversity: its importance to
human health. Harvard
Medical School, Boston. Downloadable from:
http://ees2.geo.rpiscrews.us/
abrajanoCourses/public_html/Lecture12.pdf.
Corvalan, C. et al. (2005): Ecosystems and human
well-being: Health Synthesis,
World Health Organization, Geneva. Downloadable from:
http://www.who.int/
entity/globalchange/ecosystems/ecosys.pdf
Diaz, S., et al. (2005): Biodiversity Regulation of
Ecosystem Services. In R. Hassan,
R. Scholes, & N. Ash (Eds.), Ecosystems and human well-being:
Current state
and trends: Findings of the Condition and Trends Working Group.
(pp. 297-329).
Washington (D. C.): Island Press. Downloadable from:
http://www.maweb.org/
documents/document.280.aspx.pdf
EC. Communication COM(2011): 244. ‘Our life insurance, our natural
capital: an EU
biodiversity strategy to 2020. Brussels, 3 May 2011. Downloadable
from http://
ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/biodiversity/comm2006/pdf/2020/1_EN_ACT_
part1_v7%5B1%5D.pdf
EEA. (2010): EU 2010 biodiversity baseline. EEA Technical Report,
European
Environment Agency, Luxembourg, 12/2010. Downloadable from:
http://www.eea.
europa.eu/publications/eu-2010-biodiversity-baseline
Faculty of Public Health (2010): Great Outdoors: How Our Natural
Health Service
Uses Green Space: An action report. Faculty of Public Health,
London, 1-18.
Downloadable from
http://www.fph.org.uk/uploads/r_great_outdoors.pdf
Ganesan, A. (2008). The impact of natural products upon modern
drug discovery.
Current Opinion in Chemical Biology. 12(3): 306-17.
Gidlofgunnarsson, A., and Ohrstrom, E. (2007): Noise and
well-being in urban
residential environments: The potential role of perceived
availability to nearby
green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning. 83(2-3): 115-126.
Hladnik, D. and Pirnat, J. (2011): Urban forestry—Linking
naturalness and amenity:
The case of Ljubljana, Slovenia. Urban Forestry & Urban
Greening. 10(2): 105-112.
IAP. (2010): Communique of the InterAcademy Panel Biodiversity
Conference. The
Interacademy Panel on International Issues, 13-14 January 2010,
1-4. Downloadable
from:
http://www.bioclimate.org/images/resources/resources/attachments/3170/
original_iap_communique.pdf?1279458799
Lindgren, E., and Jaenson, T. G. T. (2006): Lyme borreliosis in
Europe: influences of
climate and climate change , epidemiology , ecology and adaptation
measures.
World Health Organisation, Copenhagen. Downloadable from:
http://www.euro.
who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/96819/E89522.pdf
Ogden, N. H., and Tsao, J. I. (2009): Biodiversity and Lyme
disease: dilution or
amplification? Epidemics. 1(3): 196-206.
Paaijmans, K.P. et al. (2010): Influence of climate on malaria
transmission depends
on daily temperature variation. PNAS. 107(34): 15135-15139.
Potts, S., et al. (2006): Plant-pollinator biodiversity and
pollination services in a
complex Mediterranean landscape. Biological Conservation. 129(4):
519-529.
Ro, D.-K. et al. (2006): Production of the antimalarial
drug precursor artemisinic acid
in engineered yeast. Nature. 440: 940-943.
Schmidt, K. and Ostfeld, R.S. (2001): Biodiversity and the
Dilution Effect in Disease
Ecology. Ecology. 82(3): 609-619.
Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity World Trade
Centre. (2000).
How the Convention on Biological Diversity promotes nature and
well-being.
UNEP/CBD, April 2000: Downloadable from:
http://www.cbd.int/doc/publications/
cbd-sustain-en.pdf
Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2010):
Global Biodiversity
Outlook 3. Montréal, 94 pages. Downloadable from: http://gbo3.cbd.int/
Taori, K. et al.. (2008): Structure and activity of
largazole, a potent antiproliferatvie
agent from the Floridian marine cyanobacterium Symploca sp.
Journal of the
American Chemical Society. 130: 1806-1807.
UNEP. (1992): Convention on Biological Diversity. VNEP No.
92-8314. United Nations
Environment Programme, Nairobi, Kenya. Downloadable from:
http://www.cbd.
int/doc/legal/cbd-en.pdf
Other sources of
information
- UN Convention on Biological
Diversity
2010 International Year of Biodiversity. Protecting health by protecting the environment and conserving biodiversity - Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Biodiversity Synthesis (2005)
[pdf 13.4Mb]
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment - Biodiversity: Its Importance to Human Health [pdf 990 kb]
Interim Executive Summary. Center for Health and the Global Environment at Harvard Medical School, under the auspices of WHO and UNEP.

